7、China's one-party system enables faster decision-making than India's democratic process. When you are playing catch-up to the advanced nations of the world, what needs to get done is often pretty obvious and so the nation that can make decisions more quickly will simply get more done. It remains to be seen what will happen to this advantage when you are no longer playing catch-up, and need innovation to move the economy forward. Democracies are better in fostering innovation, but at the lower rungs of development, it's more of a catch-up game, and China has done a good job climbing up the first few rungs.
第七、中国的一檔制使决策速度比印度民主程序更快。当你在追赶世界上的先进国家时，你需要做的事情往往是显而易见的，因此，决策速度更快的国家，将会完成更多任务。但当你不再需要追赶，而是需要创新来推动经济前进时，这种优势将会发生什么变化还有待观察。民主国家在培育创新方面做得更好，但在发展阶梯的底层，这更加像一场你追我赶的游戏，而中国在攀登最初的几个梯级时，做得很好。
--------------------------------------------
【答案五】Abhimanyu Ghosh, （出生于印度，现居美国）
Political leadership
（原因在于）正治带领层。
A lot of Indians might understand this to mean the pervasiveness of corruption in the administration but that's not what I am talking about. Corruption is as widespread or even more so in China.
很多印度人可能以为这说的是印度正*府中无处不在的腐败，但这不是我所谈论的。在中国，腐败现象也很普遍，甚至更严重。
The difference lies in the fact that the leadership in China is effective and gets work done. Indian leadership cannot get work done, with or without corruption. This is pretty much the gist of it. All other differences are minor or offshoots of the same problem.
不同之处在于，中国的带领层是有效的，可以完成工作的。而印度的带领层不管有没有腐败，都不能完成工作。这才是关键。其他所有差异都是同一问题的次要或分支。
As a side note, democracy in much of the modern world has been suffering for some years now. Their latest session has been the least productive in the history of the US House of Representatives. Plenty of important bills in the US are stuck due to political stalemate. Most democratically vocal European countries are in dire straits and the ones who are doing well, with the exception of Germany, are much more socialist and rigid than most democratically structured nations of the world. Japan is another example of ineffective democratic leadership. Latin America surged to middle-income status in the 80s, mostly with new democratic leadership, but has been stuck there ever since.
顺便一提，近年来，世界大部分地区一直在遭受民主的折磨。美国众议院最近一次会期是历史上效率最低的。美国的许多重要法案因正治僵局而停滞。大多数民主的欧洲国家都处于水深火热之中。而除了德国之外，那些表现良好的国家，比世界上大多数民主结构的国家都更加得社会主义和僵化。日本是无效的民主带领的又一个例子。拉丁美洲，主要在新的民主带领下，于80年代崛起为中等收入水平后，就一直裹足不前。
8/13 首页 上一页 6 7 8 9 10 11 下一页 尾页
